Dont get me wrong, i am hacked off as much as everyone, but I think we are being a shade harsh on sparks because of the benefit of hindsight.
yes, his appointments have been bad, but I have been happy with most when they were made, bar giving mccall an extension on his last deal (and that may have been JR’s call??).
trueman and sellars led to better results and impressed during their caretaker period, so they deserved perm deals.
adams was a good appointment on paper. Had just taken morecambe up and dropped back to l2 to manage us.
hughes was a coup. Dont care what anyone says. We were buzzing when it happened, even though he’d been out of the game.
i want hughes out now and, yes, id class all as failed appointments - but i’m only able to say that with the benefit of hindsight.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
-
Welcome to Bantam Talk
Why not register for an account?Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads
-
Dismiss Notice
Premium Membership now Available
Please see this thread for more details
Most liked posts in thread: New Manager
Page 1 of 30
-
-
Using your example, Adams was appointed with a good reputation having gained promotion with other clubs and with a reputation of doing that on smallish budgets. The ideal appointment! He failed at VP despite his past achievements because his approach didn't fit well with our club. Those cultural and 'soft' issues which are part and parcel of management can't have been part of the decision making. He was a poor appointment for us.
The appointment of Trueman and Sellars with little if any league experience between them was simply a gamble; a brave gamble but not one which should not have been taken by a club who had aspirations of promotion. It was a gamble which failed after a relatively short time.
So far as Hughes is concerned, yes we should have gained one of the auto spots. Do I blame the referees for that not happening? No. It was our inability to get the best out of our squad which was responsible whether that was team selection, some of our questionable tactics, our preparation, our game management etc. We were fortunate in having the league's leading scorer in the squad which masked some of the other shortcomings. We flattered to deceive at times. Blaming the refs is just a cop out.
I recall Sparks saying quite publicly that not getting promotion would be regarded as failure. Hughes also said towards the end of the season that promotion was 'our intention' (his expression). It's self evident that we failed and that Hughes' intention wasn't fulfilled. I have yet to see anything from an organisational or strategic perspective which addresses those shortcomings despite our improvements on the commercial side of the business.
Is it your view that we should now continue on in the same vein or are changes required if we are to get out of this league?
Alternatively maybe you could have a word with Sparks? It would help enormously if the CEO could come out and express his concerns and annoyance publicly and how the club will address the mediocre performances which he has claimed previously he doesn't accept.Keefly Bantam, simons (woking bantam), Ponty City and 10 others like this. -
Rogered Tart Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 EntrantRCarol, QCFC BANTAM, Kopendin1964 and 10 others like this.
-
Rogered Tart Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 EntrantBronco, Bantam Boy, The Evidence and 9 others like this.
-
Sooner Hughes is fired the better. Sparks will dither and drag it into Oct. we need to act now. The bloke does not have a Scooby.
simons (woking bantam), Ponty City, The Evidence and 8 others like this. -
With some, Hughes is beyond reproach and it's easier to criticise the players. But the reality is that the current squad is almost entirely built from Hughes' recruits; they are coached and prepared by Hughes and Hughes' staff; Hughes selects the team; Hughes dictates the tactics; they play to Hughes's formation. The performances of the squad are Hughes' responsibilty. Unfortunately, it will be more of the same unless Hughes changes his mindset and his approach and I struggle to see how that would happen.Hampshire Bantam, vladimir, Ponty City and 8 others like this. -
bantam2708 Squad PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 Winner
Sparks cannot be allowed to make another footballing decision at this club ever again, especially with regards to hiring managers. He hasn't got a single footballing decision right since he was made CEO.
Ponty City, Inspector, Jab88 and 8 others like this. -
Rogered Tart Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 EntrantBronco, Craven Koppite, Leeds Bantam and 8 others like this.
-
Sadly this site has now slipped into a catalogue of comments where the author is trying to trip other contributers up and take a slightly superior stance.
I still would prefer Hughes was replaced as there are just too many failings in my eyes but I do respect the majority want him to stay, be that for at least another half dozen games or until the end of the season and his current contract.
I am very disappointed with so much about City at present as I really felt this might be the coaching and recruitment team to take us forward, think thats why I am so underwhelmed by them.
Going to haave a break on here as my views on Hughes wont change, hope I am proved so wrong and we go on an insane winning run!
Always a City fan, be kind and tolerant to one another - even the WUM's -
Grinding out the rest of the season for what ?? disappointment of facing yet another season in L2 watching the most negative football imaginable, the frustration of seeing things 17000 fans can but the manager refuses to, he proved yesterday his first half team selection compared to the second half was woeful not forgetting they are all his players
Have you not seen enough in the 76 (18 months) games he's been in charge 30 wins 24 draw 22 loses (according to Wiki) and the worst brand of football imaginable to realise he's not the man to take us up let alone keep us there
Yes we have injury problems that's not unique so does every other club at some point in the season but they change things round and make the best of what they have we seem to shoehorn players into a system that's proven not to work
Cook was never going to repeat last season's heroics and replacing him with Derbyshire was pure attacking suicide
Won't even touch on Jake Young (he's proving that himself) am done with giving him 10/15 matches I've seen enough in the last 76 to realise it's time to join the "managerial merry go round" again I do however fear the credentials of the "selection committee"
Hats off to Hughes a fantastic player who risks tainting that reputation by trying to be a manager trading on passed reputation may sell season tickets for us but it's not a recipe for successJohnny Yen, simons (woking bantam), JudgeMental and 8 others like this. -
bantam2708 Squad PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 Winner
Hughes hasn't been here two weeks. He's been here 18 months. By now, we should've created a clear identity with regards to style and system but the truth is we have neither. Everything is muddled and constantly changing because he still doesn't know what works and what doesn't. Ironically, I'd say our most consistent run of performances came at the back end of his first season but since then, style and intent have deteriorated.
Bronco, Ponty City, Biker and 7 others like this. -
WilsdenBantam Squad PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Euro 2020
STUART, STUART, STUART!
Bring, him, home, now!Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...Urbanchicken, Ponty City, Edinho1 and 6 others like this. -
Rogered Tart Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
-
I totally don't have a clue anymore what the right decision is? Are we supposed to stick with a manager who appears to be failing despite having good resources? And all because we haven't stuck with anyone before? I'd love us to find a manager we can stick with but my opinion is MH is not that guy, don't get me wrong hopefully i'm way wrong and he crushes it, but my guess is he's not the guy.
CT Bantam, Two Legs, Ponty City and 6 others like this. -
-
In the cold light of day, who would make the decision to get rid of Hughes who still has another 9 months left on his contract?
Rupp? Highly unlikely given that the club is financially stable and doesn't require any injection of funds from Rupp in the immediate future. He'll be happy to let it continue to tick over and wait for somebody to buy the club at his price. Promotion to a higher league would be a bonus for him.
Sparks? Don't make me laugh! He is still in awe of Hughes and continues to wet his pants at the thought of an email from Hughes landing in his spam folder asking for a job. He hasn't the balls to take such a step even in the best interests of the club. Despite being at VP for several years, I'm still of the belief that he doesn't grasp lower league football. His track record of appointing failing managers tends to support that. It's the name that really matters.
The only person imo who could remove Hughes from the club is Hughes himself. If he fails to improve performances and fails to get within sight of a promotion spot or completely loses the support of the fans, he may well jump himself. That's the best we can expect.borderlescott, Ponty City, Onside and 6 others like this. -
Get him in.Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...The Evidence, Ponty City, Rcbantam and 6 others like this. -
They even make us defend on our own goal line after we scored
They stop us playing another striker alongside Cook
But what I find most unacceptable is after drawing level at Carlisle when we had a glimmer of hope they take off our best attacking option
Pfffft who needs emBronco, simons (woking bantam), Gardscoigne and 6 others like this. -
I hope you don’t go. You make very valuable and constructive postings. Like you I keep changing my mind. I also don’t like the superiority postings as if those that disagree are second class citizens. I would love it if we could put a winning run together but I can’t see it happening. You are just as entitled to your view as anyone else in here.Salty, RCarol, Bantamsteve and 6 others like this. -
bailiff bridge bantam Impact SubP.L.22/23 Entrant Euro 2020
I clapped like a demented seal at HT.
That definitely made Derbyshire less shit.Morley Bantam, Citymatt, ahar964 and 6 others like this.
Page 1 of 30