Steve Banks

You’re arguing with yourself now

 

That doesn’t mean Rhodes is reporting directly to Edin!

 

Rhodes and Edin are working as joint CEOs. Hopkin’s decision to release Banks

 

You have to ask has it taken Julian to be brought in to allow Hopkin the start changing things on the footballing side, getting rid of Steve Banks, and Greg back scouting, no mention of Martin Drury as yet.
If so more power to Julian.

 

And yet you couldn’t answer it??!

 

You had a couple of pints again?

 

Why do you continue with this assertion? Rahic told Hopkin he could change his staff. Hopkin said he wanted to give current staff a chance. Rupp reinforced the view that Hopkin had control. Hopkin wanted staff that they were all at risk of losing their roles. Rhodes comes onboard and Hopkin finally makes the changes.

Do you not see the timing is simply coincidental?

 

You still not prepared to answer the question?

 

I thought it was known that the Livingston staff didn't want to come here?

 

I will humour you now.

Yes as I said it’s coincidental that Rhodes comes in and backroom changes happen?

 

So you wasn’t trying to insinuate there was more to it? Ok, if you say so...!

“Entitled to your opinion but I find it very coincidental that we are now moving on coaching staff and Hopkin is getting his own In despite Rhodes only been here a week.

Maybe they were waiting for something else to happen, who knows but it all seems coincidental to me”

 

I’ve just repeated what I said originally. You’re the one who thinks theirs an ulterior motive. Is that my problem or yours?

Or again are you fishing for an argument

 

Give over you clown - everyone can read that original comment and can see clearly that you insinuated there was something more than just coincidence...!

Argue against it all you like, but your words are still there....! I’ll leave you to claim you didn’t but it’s clear you did. I won’t bother further as you’re just a freaking WUM

 

Thank god.