Flyover Refund Received in Full

What difference does something being true make?

I could call someone an Arsehole and while it possibly might be true it certainly wouldn't be mature or befitting if I was an influencial figure in an official branch of a Bradford City travel club.

 

I have no idea what point you are trying to make here. I am guessing you are close to the founder of Wilsden Bantams? If so you should know better than to question any comment I may have made about them.

 

In 30 years I have very rarely used travel clubs so it's nothing to do with any other branch but If you genuinely can't see the point I'm making then don't worry about it. As you were.

 

Sod it, against my better judgement I'll spell it out.

As you use the site for official adverts for the Bingley Bantams then every post you make with the same account represents the Bingley Bantams in some way.

It's really not rocket science.

 

I don't use this site to advert Bingley Bantams events. It's not rocket science is it !!

 

To be fair, he was right though, as it all ended rather quickly.

 

If Bingley Bantams are helping out during the rail strikes , could they pick me up in Keighley Boxing Day and drop me off at the Corn Dolly 8:30 am ok

 

Did I not see a headline in the paper stating that rahic and Bradford city have parted. Yes he may hold 22% but he isn't at the club ie left hopefully never to return. Is this correct. Don't take it personally that you was made to look daft by saying show me so big Rod did just that. So now who's failed.

 

Out of interest has it ever been confirmed his actual ownership percentage?

Did @Dennis ever get to the bottom of who owned what percentage of the German Holding company that own the club?

 

Has Napoleon contradicted himself again ! haha

 

I don't meant to butt in, but I feel that if Bingley Bantams, Park and Banbrotam could just all get together and agree to admit they backed the wrong horse I feel it'd go a long way to getting them a bit more respect on these boards than continuing to argue the indefensible.

 

Banbrotam won't do it, he likes to be in the minority. He's a bit like the other "Mr different" on here that would argue night was day if he fancied it. Backs it up with decent knowledge and well constructed points though to be fair to him.

Park? Is just park, people have learnt to more or less ignore him now. Every now and then he'll make a valid point but he reminds me of a maths class dunce just randomly shouting out numbers. Eventually he's bound to get one right much to the rest of the classes amazement.

And I daren't say anything about City since 67 as apparently it will have catastrophic consequences for the club by deterring non existent investors and plunge us into the brink of administration again.

 

I backed no horse. When the two came in I thought they had some decent ideas and to be fair what they have done on the pitch and the new in-house shop and ticketing system and even being for probably the first time being able to hear the loudspeaker on the kop. I thought they were right to sack Stuart but since then everything they have done has been disastrous. However Edin is not the Devil incarnate I met him a couple of times as have others I know and he seemed a very decent bloke to talk to. So balance is needec

 

Loud speaker in the Kop. Hear it? I wish.

 

That just about puts it in a nutshell mate, a thoroughly decent bloke, who took on something he had no previously experience in and once he got that position was very reluctant to listen to others who were getting paid to do their job and others who had the experience and offered it were ignored.