Stuart At The Firepit Wed

It has been said before, there was only 1 method of communication to Stefan, that was via Edin...wonder why...

 

Been a while since posted Glenn, but you at least started to listen to us on here and try and make things right. Thank you.

 

Rahic behaviour described as childish.
The thing that struck me is although Marshall cited going back to family he was prepared to sign for another year. Mezza and mcardle too.
All very unnecessary.

 

Glenn, when was the first time you met James, presumably a regular in corporate, sponsors events etc?

 

Lets not forget the role the Bingley Bantams played in what happened, albeit in a small way, with their ‘support the club no matter what’ mantra, and cosying up to Edin for personal gain. They were complicit, and now they’re putting on nights like this to find some answers about what what went on, like it came as a bit of a shock, okay..Maybe they should be answering a few questions themselves.

 

Are you in denial if you think our dimise was down to James Mason, Gregg Abbott, and Stuart McCall.
Don't think Ive missed any one have I.

 

The Company cat, Dave.
Trust me ...... I and others have always sought the poor little sod, at one time or another !

 

Shame those that knew as much, and posted to that effect, weren't listened to earlier. In fact, weren't the Bingley Bantams one of those groups who backed Edin to just about the bitter end...?

 

As far as I can recall both Bingley Bantams and Shipley Bantams were Edin fans both enjoying access to him and revelling in his glow

 

Don't buy that at all, one method of communication yet a fan got a message directly to Stefan? Were they really trying that hard to ''rescue'' our club?

 

Wasn't it the Bingley Bantams who were saying we should stop having a go at Edin because he only had the clubs interest at heart and tryed to get @JonButterfield to stop the banner from taking place. That worked out well.

 

I believe there were two fans who had one to one meetings with Stefan in Munich and brought him up to speed with regards Rahic and the goings on at our club, because of the very reason given above Rahic controlled everything.
Everything went through Rahic and he fed Stefan stuff he wanted to hear.

 

The point he's making is that if an ordinary fan can get a message to Stefan about the situation at the club then it's reasonable to assume that two integral staff members could have also spoken to him if they had wished.

 

Integral staff employed by Rahic, I'm not sure Stafan would have believed them as he was very trusting of Rahic his business partner.
I believe Glenn Ackroyds post cover the reasons why.

https://bantamtalk.com/index.php?threads/stuart-at-the-firepit-wed.3169/#post-270004

 

Nail on head NM.

 

So he's happy to believe a random fan yet won't put trust in the opinion of people on his payroll?

Absolute nonsense and I can't believe I've even taken the time to reply!

 

I'm know one of the people who meet him was not just a random fan, and I'd suggest John Dewhirst is one of our better known fan but believe what you want.

 

So John Dewhirsts opinion carried more weight with the club owner than Greg Abbott or James Mason while they were employed by the club?

Is that the angle you're really going with?

 

Dewhirst likes to think he’s important. So I’m not surprised at the idea he’s somehow responsible for getting rid of Edin.

 

What I'm saying is two fans had meeting with Stefan, like it or not John Dewhirst is the type of fan who knows the club inside out so as I posted at the time a great lad to meet with Stefan and let him know what was going on at our club, and as I posted the other person was far from a random fan
I'm giving you facts not debating who Stefan might have taken notice of, as I've said @Glenn Ackroyd post say it all.