Quantcast
  1. Welcome to Bantam Talk

    Why not register for an account?

    Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads

  2. Premium Membership now Available


    Please see this thread for more details

    Dismiss Notice

The Voice - Match preview Bradford City vs Swindon Town Tuesday 25 October @ 7:45pm

Discussion in 'City Talk' started by The Voice, Oct 23, 2022.

  1. The Original EB

    The Original EB Squad Player

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,938
    Likes Received:
    2,443
    As you had such a good view (?) were such sitting amongst the Swindon fans?
     
  2. Bumblebee_Tuna

    Bumblebee_Tuna Squad Player
    P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2018
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    I have only seen the angle on this thread. I'm trying to understand the furore on here. Is the issue...

    a) the ball didn't hit his arm?
    b) the ball hit his arm but it wasn't intentional?
     
  3. Inspector

    Inspector Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,244
    Likes Received:
    7,264
    He's another player who's been blighted by injury since he arrived and has missed more than he's been available for. He's a massive miss but as you it might take a few sub appearances before he starts games. Maybe early December.
     
  4. Stafford Bantam

    Stafford Bantam Captain
    Moderator P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 30

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    4,662
    Likes Received:
    7,814
    At the match last night, I had no idea re the penalty.

    Looking at the picture posted above, my instant reaction was no way, but then I saw this blown up version of a segment of that picture. It looks like the tip of Halliday's hand is just showing below the ball and it is out from his body, which would make it a penalty.
    [​IMG]
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. 1976Bantam

    1976Bantam Emergency Backup

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2018
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    210
    The part of the laws I don’t see being referenced here is “deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball”. The next point is then about unnaturally bigger.

    Halliday looks like he leans a bit towards the ball as it comes in. If it’s then hit his arm, even if by his side, that’s handball given in theory he’s far enough away for it to avoid his arm - really difficult to tell from the TV angle though if that’s definitely what he does.

    Wasn’t there last night but from memory the assistant in that half is typically on the other side of the pitch to this. What I would say is the ref is some way outside the area, looking through at least 1 player at this. If the assistant on (presumably) the other side hasn’t seen it clearly - and I’m wondering how they could TBH - then how the ref has seen it to give it, given its on the side of Halliday’s body the ref can’t physically see, is beyond me.

    Was it the correct decision in the end under the laws? Possibly.

    Could the officials clearly see the incident to be certain? I don’t see how that’s possible based on the above. Happy to be corrected though re the assistant.
     
  6. JonButterfield

    JonButterfield Star Player
    Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    14,674
    Likes Received:
    24,703
    Definitely couldn't have seen it, therefore a guess, therefore extremely poor and weak refereeing.
     
    Damo and Wakefield Bantam like this.
  7. SteveC

    SteveC Squad Player
    Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2019
    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    4,313
    I've read plenty of comments on Twitter from Swindon fans, saying we are a really good team. Not the first opposition to say that about us this season, I find it is often reassuring to get a perspective of BCAFC from other fans, despite the meltdown from many of our own
     
    Wakefield Bantam likes this.
  8. SteveC

    SteveC Squad Player
    Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2019
    Messages:
    2,196
    Likes Received:
    4,313
    I went for a leak during the break in play around the 70th minute (Midland Road stand). I walked past 6 stewards, stood in a circle having a good laugh and messing about. They were still there when I walked back...including the "senior" steward, the short lad who normally hovers up and down E block steps telling our fans to sit down and stop goading the opposition fans :rolleyes: and the same lad who eventually rugby tackled the pitch invader. The stewards are often a pointless entity and wouldn't have a scooby do what to do in an emergency situation. In fact another of the group chinwagging was the huge asian lad who waddled towards the pitch invader :joy:
     
  9. chris mac

    chris mac Fringe Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    563
    A steward near A block in the midland road stand celebrated the swindon goal .
     
  10. pns1945

    pns1945 Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    2,280
    If scoring isn't coming naturally and with regularity then we need to address this issue in January if we can. Goals win games but we need to be more potent up front, because,if Cooke is snuffed out our main hopes lie with Wright mainly. Defensively we've improved a lot but cannot hope for a shut out every match.
     
  11. Bigrod

    Bigrod Captain
    Moderator Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 30

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    9,061
    Likes Received:
    11,125
    What isn’t clear from the Football Authorities, is the ‘threshold’ they employ to determine an ‘incident’.

    In Civil Law it is the ‘Balance of Probability’, the mythical 51%. They would have to be satisfied that there was reasonable intent.

    Criminal Law operates on’ Beyond Reasonable Doubt’, which is a vey high threshold.

    Looking at the pictures/footage/position of the officials, I would assume that it would be difficult to say with authority that it was a handball.

    Again a defendant is usually given the ‘benefit of the doubt’.

    I think the information available would make it difficult to say with absolute certainty it was hand ball.

    Even the lay courts such as the Magistrate’s Courts, provide judgements to explain the criteria they have employed to determine a matter.

    Referee’s at this level are paid a hefty fee (far more than Magistrates get for attendance), and it seems as though they should be able to justify their decisions in a way that fairness can be seen to be done.
     
    Wakefield Bantam likes this.
  12. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player
    P.L. 20/21 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    9,710
    Likes Received:
    19,197
    You said that we wouldn't find a single one. I did, in about 3 minutes.
     
  13. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player
    P.L. 20/21 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    9,710
    Likes Received:
    19,197
    Why? Does a protest often get decisions overturned?
     
  14. Bumblebee_Tuna

    Bumblebee_Tuna Squad Player
    P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2018
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    True. I over reached a bit. You'd be lucky to find better than an 80/20 split on a neutral poll. Maybe I'll put it to the test.
     
  15. Bumblebee_Tuna

    Bumblebee_Tuna Squad Player
    P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2018
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Come on now the reactions of the players is very telling. Its a fairly well known meter by which to measure whether a decision is unreasonable or not.
     
  16. Park bantam

    Park bantam Regular Starter
    P.L.22/23 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    18,301
    Likes Received:
    19,845
    I don’t like it but by todays interpretations it was a penalty. Very unfortunate but still a penalty
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. Bumblebee_Tuna

    Bumblebee_Tuna Squad Player
    P.L.23/24 Entrant

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2018
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Do you think it was intentional?
     
  18. 1976Bantam

    1976Bantam Emergency Backup

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2018
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    210
    As a ref, when doing initial training you’re told its basically a case of you need to be certain and not be ‘guessing’ - obviously linked to guidance around positioning etc on the field to make sure you have a view of the majority of incidents.

    Otherwise you need to be honest and say you couldn’t see the incident properly.

    My assumption here is the ref can perhaps see (at least some of) the ball touch Halliday, Swindon players go mad so gives it. If so, that’s really poor.

    I’m usually one to defend refs and try to understand how they’ve arrived at
    a decision - but with this one I genuinely can’t, based on ref’s apparent view of the incident and positioning.
     
  19. Tingleyb

    Tingleyb Impact Sub
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    912
    Witnessed a Swindon fan driving on Midland Rd around 22.10 windows down, stereo blaring and racist sing lyrics and language heard aimed at Bradford City and local population. Only regret I didn't get chance to video him. Anyone else witness him. It was a small 4x4 like a suzuki. Swindon need to turf out this sort of supporter ....
     
  20. Aleman

    Aleman Fringe Player

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    761
    Watch the slow motion a few times and step it through a frame at a time. It drops sharply as if it hit his arm that he pulls backwards a bit, away from the ball - but arm contact is only after it comes off his chest first. I'd scream for it against us but it's not a penalty for me if arm contact comes second. The ref would struggle with this even if he could see it well, but I suspect he was placed where he could not see the chest contact first.



    I'd still rather have controveries like the ref getting this wrong rather than VAR delays and refs still getting them wrong!
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice