Flyover Cancellation

Because you're full of BS.

Disappointed @JonButterfield even listened to you.

 

Oh you just want to impress Edin.

Edin's mates in town and want to impress Edin it wouldn't shock me if you stopped the fly over and now making up rubbish about investment.

 

Ooh confidentiality, there you go again, as i said you claim to be ITK and love to bleat about it, maybe you should keep quiet instead of saying i know this and i know that and then when you are questioned about it you claim it's confidential, it's called wumming in my opinion.
You and Rahic make an ideal couple full of BS.
Don't even bother to reply to this, i have no interest in your wumming posts.

 

Why are you getting angry.. information has been given ... reading what’s been said it’s pretty obvious who’s asked for this and where the money is coming from. And no it’s not Rahic.. as he’s as tights as a nats arse!!!

 

feck it, get it up and running for the next home game. Maybe take Rupps name off, should never have cancelled it

 

Not getting angry, just bugs me when folk say i know this and that but when questioned refuse to answer, why say it in the first place if your not prepared to answer.

 

#bringbacktheflyover

 

Me too Bruce
Come to the conclusion they know the same as me
NOTHING !!!!!!'

 

Your above comment suggest you are also ITK, how can you caturgorigally state it was not Edin who asked for the fly bye to be cancelled, @City-since-67 says he had friends/guests over from Germany and maybe didn't want the embarrassment of a plane flying passed with a banner saying "Rahic & Rupp out", not having a go just asking how you know or is it an opinion ?.

 

I’m in no way itk.. i just choose to believe what @City-since-67 is saying

 

Whens the reimbursement coming then? This has been well and truly bottled.

 

But has given information out.. he’s given plenty. However that doesn’t mean he has to give out every detail.. as he’s Ben asked in good faith to keep certain things quiet..

Problem is you’re all desperate for more and more information... yet if he had come on here and said “Edin has smacked someone and been done for drunk driving” you’re happy to take it at face value

 

It’s been 2 days one of which was a match day and the other a Sunday.. give them a chance

 

Bingley bant

Todays Monday, it's 6pm

 

Yes I agree I believe @City-since-67 is an honest poster, but what has actually been said, plenty of us speculating but we don't know, and if new money does not get invested @City-since-67 is in a compromising position ?.

 

And it all happened late Saturday afternoon

 

He has said Edin has nothing to do with it.. so it’s fairly obvious from that if it’s not Edin it’s one of not very many other people who’s asked Bingley Bantams to get involved... I have a thought on who that is, I’m sure you do too... if CS67 was asked not to name names then he’s honouring his word got no problem with that

 

So what? It's the working day, you'd think it'd be getting sorted seeing as how rash the decision was to pull the plug and on the promise of reimbursement. This whole thing will turn into a shambles and the melt down will commence.

 

Everyone has their own views of who is in the know or not personally Dave I think you and I know as much as everyone else SFA
If it is true that Bingley Bantams were told and to keep it quiet they deserve for only members of Bingley Bantams to turn up for the next match and have an empty stadium this costing them even more revenue
Bradford City is club for ALL its supporters and if they have anything to say about any event they should address everyone and not just the chosen few
Cloak and Dagger tactics will only stir up more unrest the main root of our problems

 

A meltdown of about 10 people.. however I doubt it will get to that. I don’t get why people think someone is trying to con people... especially when money is involved as it could turn into a criminal offence. If there is a massive urgency for the money back I’m sure the organiser of the fly over will make the right people aware