Wyke

Edited to make it more accurate

 

McMahon is a better full back than Darby in every aspect

 

Personal opinion. If you combined the two you would have a gobshite with the legs of a spider.

 

Yeah it is, he is a wind up merchant and the amount of free kicks he wins for City directly from getting in the oppos heads is all good for me.

 

absolutely if you are drunk and/or partially sighted

 

Darby is the better defender without a shadow of doubt but that's all he is. He can't do anything else. McMahon is a wannabe midfield player who's legs have gone. His posturing in some games has been embarrassing to watch.

 

So why has McMahon played twice as many games at a much higher level than Darby ? Both have positive points, both negative and are different players. Parky got it right playing them both

 

Because he's better going forward and gets countless assists. But Darby is a better defender.

 

He's a bit of a Twit, but right now he's our Twit, Parky was a dick on the touchline but he was our dick and that was all that mattered

 

I'd prefer it if he was a good footballer myself.