Transfer talk

The difference is Reeves is a holding player. I welcomed Law back because I remembered a player who used to run at defences and get in the box. That seems to have been coached out of him. His sideways movement and passing frustrates the hell out of me.

 

Am I not allowed to believe he's just not very good?

 

Maybe so, scored 20 in 86 for Rangers, 8 in 80 (3 spells) for City

 

Oh yes............ And it's cost Stefan a fair wedge to fund his hobby !

 

This is up there with the most ridiculous things you've ever posted, and that's a VERY long list.

 

I'm the opposite view. I think Law has gone backwards and can't stick to the left like he's been asked but with Reeves think we might just have the real deal especially if he gets to play on a football pitch and we put a much better midfield round him. I would certainly be peed off if he was to leave. He's probably the only pure passer we possess....sorry....this is about Reeves.

 

I think he’s a shrewd player and looks to have an eye for a killer pass. I think he’ll surprise a few next season - he ain’t no Bradley Dack but I think he’s better than he’s shown so far.

 

No I am afraid Stuart’s love child has been found out. We saw at the start of the season how good Reeves was before his injury.

 

Sorry Soup edited it because i'd missed they were arguing about Law. Totaly agree with you though.

 

all your proving is that you know football about as much as Edin Rahic does.

Law is a much better player than Reeves.

 

During the first

No I think Grayson knows football better than you and Law isn’t even a squad player now.

 

No worries - I lose track of the arguments on here (sorry, debates!!)

 

and I think McCall knows football better than you, and he was a key player during a time we were consistently top 6.

 

He's had a better season yes but its no surprise ones injured and now the other is out of favour. Whether you think that or not i know where my money will be come close season on who goes or stays.

 

he will leave at the end of the season, but it doesn't mean he's no good.

 

I never said he was no good. I just don't think he's the type of player City will look to have next season. Law can carry the ball but does he create chances....does he make things happen?

I see us having a completely different midfield next season

 

Agreed.

Law is excellent at looking after the ball, keeping posession, recycling play. he was exactly what our midfield under McCall needed.
he is not a Simon Grayson blood and thunder midfielder, and he will leave.

 

No, I just go to most matches home and away.

To say Reeves is better than Law just highlights how you act like a teenager.

I know you've a poster of Reeves on your bedroom wall but just admit it yourself he isn't that good.

 

And lost 10 out of 12. Law has the ability but doesn’t use it.

its not a matter of blood and thunder. Law is capable of much more he has the ability to take people on get in the box and create danger in little cameos he has shown that. Instead he plays lazy sideways passes