Anton McElhone

what does my opinion of his ability have to do with whether he's injured or not?

I think he was poor, and I also think there's no way he's been injured for over a year.

 

Didn’t Hopkin say something about him playing through the pain a few weeks ago? Doesn’t seem to have taken that advice! Hopkin obviously is not impressed with Reeves. I would like a full analysis of his injuries, as we haven’t had that kind of information plus when the medical team feel he can play.

 

Its been constantly spoke about in the T&A when Parkers asked about his injury updates.

 

He was decent before his injury

 

Consistently?

 

All these people, sounds like a proper football club.

 

He played the majority of games leading up to his injury so I'd say he was consistently good enough to get in the team. Apart from the Wimbledon game I don't recall him having a shocker.

 

I was referring to his performances - I thought at times his passing was poor in some games but was not aware we had signed him with an existing injury - until it was reported - We should give him another chance to prove himself. The problem is will he take it upon himself to declare himself fit + make himself available again.

 

is Reeves still laid up or is he training at all?

 

The new coach has brought some novel ideas with him.
They're going to stick a hot potato up Reeves arse to try get him motivated.
A little like the Victorian coal pit Ponies on cold mornings.

 

12 months ago.....and now can't seem to be arsed to wear the shirt and Hopkin implies it's not the same injury but other little niggles....Jones as well....he didn't' warm up properly but has been out for 3 weeks since...

if they don't have the balls to play then do one.

 

I agree

 

Looks like our new coach/sport scientist is having a positive effect. Had them all running lol

https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/17282702.bradford-city-caddis-welcomes-input-of-new-coach-mcelhone/

 

Is it any coincidence that since the new number 2 has been with the players we are starting to score goals for fun?

 

Or maybe Hopkin has gone down the Keegan route & decided that we're that sh!t at the back lets try and outscore the opposition

 

Needs a bit of tweaking

 

You saying we're not sh!t at the back?

 

Is it any coincidence that since the new number 2 has been with the players we are conceding more goals than ever?

 

Really? We conceded thirteen goals in four consecutive games in October to the might of Rochdale, Accrington, Coventry and Gillingham.

 

I'm making the point that the positive comparison and apportioning credit is silly until results start to pick up.