Quantcast
  1. Welcome to Bantam Talk

    Why not register for an account?

    Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads

  2. Premium Membership now Available


    Please see this thread for more details

    Dismiss Notice

UK Energy Needs

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by trevor, Feb 12, 2022.

  1. YungNath

    YungNath Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    2,237
    its proven they cant do fracking without causing earth tremors Trevor. There are other forms of energy we can use without literally causing man made earthquakes.
     
  2. trevor

    trevor Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    7,676
    Mining coal produced far bigger earth tremors than the minor one in the North West fracking site but nobody suggested stopping mining coal
     
  3. YungNath

    YungNath Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    2,237
    I would argue that happened at a time when environmental concerns simply weren't concerns at all.
     
    Offcomedun likes this.
  4. Offcomedun

    Offcomedun Important Player
    Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter Euro2020 Winner Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 3rd Place

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2018
    Messages:
    7,102
    Likes Received:
    10,914
    Again, it comes back to governments governing instead of relying on the vagaries of the so called 'free market'. Domestic gas and electricity bills have skyrocketed since they were privatised and have largely passed into foreign ownership. It's ridiculous to leave essential energy supplies in the hands of profiteering companies. It's abdicating responsibility. The government has spent around £35b on hideously ineffective Covid services run by its insider friends, but is powerless to subsidise domestic fuel bills because it has given the supply away to foreign companies.
     
  5. Aaron Baker

    Aaron Baker Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2018
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    3,969
    Isn't this exactly the issue though? Right now all meaningful energy extraction/creation causes environmental concerns but we're not allowed any trade off at all.

    If it's not wind (Where the UK is already a world leader - is it something like 6 of the 10 largest offshore windfarms are in the UK?) or tidal - which can also have environmental concerns and is in it's relative infancy, then an element of the population don't want to know.

    It's okay saying we need to get rid of gas but 85% of homes in the UK are heated in that way so the infrastructure changes are enormous.

    So long term a plan to increase renewables is the right one but we also need to find solutions in the short terms and ALL of them have environmental impacts. You can't get around it. I don't know enough about fracking as all sources seem to be biased in some way but shipping shale gas from America where it has been fracked anyway doesn't seem particularly environmentally friendly either on the face of it.
     
    trevor likes this.
  6. YungNath

    YungNath Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    2,237
    Well I think a part of this is caused by us refusing to grasp the nettle earlier and spend the time and money required to get these other forms of energy generation to a point where they are viable. Now we're all going to be hit in the pocket massively because of it.

    I agree we have serious short term challenges in changing this but it's made geopolitical sense to make this shift anyway, given how the main exporter of gas in europe is now well up for starting ww3. It's a difficult question with no easy answers but I think would be fair to say simply continuing as we are is emphatically not the best course of action.
     
  7. Aaron Baker

    Aaron Baker Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2018
    Messages:
    3,820
    Likes Received:
    3,969
    Doesn't the fact we're a world leader in wind power show that we have done the first bit? What are the actual expectations in real terms?

    Isn't Trevor advocating moving away from staying as we are? Everything in your second paragraph pushes us to the conclusion that we need to be more self sufficient however everything that we would do to achieve that has environmental impacts so we surely need to balance those two things logically.
     
    trevor likes this.
  8. trevor

    trevor Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    7,676
    Maybe we better start drilling again
     
  9. Tony Wilkinson

    Tony Wilkinson Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 10

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    6,794
    Likes Received:
    9,030
    If it wasn't for the Russian backed various climate change groups and shale gas protesters etc we wouldn't have to go looking abroad for our energy supplies....
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. Storck

    Storck Regular Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    38,554
    Likes Received:
    29,357
    just paying more?
     
  11. Stafford Bantam

    Stafford Bantam Captain
    Moderator P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 30

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    4,660
    Likes Received:
    7,808
    I do not understand why you want us to invest in expensive sources of energy, when we have an almost limitless supply of much cheaper, home produced energy that we can invest in.

    And as for the Russians backing climate change groups that want us to move away from russian oil and gas, well that's just laughable.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
    YungNath and Offcomedun like this.
  12. Tony Wilkinson

    Tony Wilkinson Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 10

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    6,794
    Likes Received:
    9,030
    * Because wind and solar power that we produce is not enough for our needs.

    * Quite the opposite, they don't want us to produce our own so that they can sell to us, don't tell me the XR group and it's other like minded fools are not funded by our adversaries..
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. Stafford Bantam

    Stafford Bantam Captain
    Moderator P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 30

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    4,660
    Likes Received:
    7,808
    I don't believe we should just rely on wind and solar for our electricity, but it is theoretically possible, when combined with modern storage systems.

    I have no doubt that certain groups (and not just protest groups) are funded by our adversaries. However, many of these 'climate' protest groups want us to be energy self sufficient.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. trevor

    trevor Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    7,676
    Wind power has two major problems that mean we have to have good back up sources, When the wind is low they do not produce and when the wind is to high they shut down to avoid damage, They are great as a back up but not reliable enough to base our energy needs on, This year and last year we have had to open carbon burning facilities to avoid blackouts buying woodchip from abroad to feed them
     
    Tony Wilkinson likes this.
  15. Offcomedun

    Offcomedun Important Player
    Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter Euro2020 Winner Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 3rd Place

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2018
    Messages:
    7,102
    Likes Received:
    10,914
    Not at the moment. But that's because Cameron's government cancelled their promised plans for massive expansion of our renewable capability. There are numerous wind and wave schemes that are waiting to go and could be built relatively quickly but are waiting for government planning permission. By contrast, it would be many years before environmentally damaging fracking could produce any results. It's the dinosaurs on the right of the Tory Party who are stymying our renewable potential for political reasons.
     
    YungNath likes this.
  16. Tony Wilkinson

    Tony Wilkinson Squad Player
    P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 10

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    6,794
    Likes Received:
    9,030
    That's a ridiculous and unfounded thing to say, but I do agree re tidal waves, if that could be harnessed it would see us right for as long as we wanted...
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. YungNath

    YungNath Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    2,237
    you've just tried to claim XR is a russian plant tony
     
  18. Offcomedun

    Offcomedun Important Player
    Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter Euro2020 Winner Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 3rd Place

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2018
    Messages:
    7,102
    Likes Received:
    10,914
    It's not ridiculous or unfounded. There are numerous renewable energy schemes planned and waiting to be built, including several wave schemes. The only thing holding them up is government go-ahead. The reason the government won't give the go-ahead is to appease the dinosaur climate change sceptics on the right of the Tory Party including those with interests in the fracking business
     
  19. SimonW

    SimonW Administrator
    Admin Moderator Qatar 2022 Entrant P.L. 20/21 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant P.L. 18/19 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    5,753
    Likes Received:
    3,842
    Tidal has major enviromental issues though. You generally need to dig new lagoons which can damage habitats, the turbines can kill and injury marine animals and the electromagnetic fields and noise has been shown in some studies to imapct some animals, especially those that use echo location. It's the problem with a few of these greener energies, they have enviromental and ecological issues that need alot fo studies to evaluate if teh trade off's are worth it.

    And with tidal It's also really expensive at this moment and while they say it can supply 20% of our energy needs how many of them do we need at this high cost to get that figure especially as the techs still pretty new so will be inefficient? I know the proposals in the Severn saw something like 5 proposals with the cheapest costs £2.3bn. It's like with wind where the current turbines would take the whole of the Isle of Wight to be covered in them to produce the same electricty as a single coal power plant (assuming they could run 24/7 which they can't) and that many turbines would cost way more than a coal powered plant.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice