Most liked posts in thread: Salford City away

I’ll say it......

So Rupp hasn’t got his wallet out since he arrived?

 

Nail on the head there Dave !

 

Is that a question or a statement?

 

Lets be honest though, Salford City don't deserve their success, much like Chelsea and Man City before them.

They have a lot of money. That is the only reason they are any good.

And as always, such normally unattainable progress has isolated Some fans.

 

If the 'class of 92' are in it for footballing reasons, would it be beyond (or beneath) them to offer free coaching sessions - Perhaps they do ?

 

Actually, if they all put their votes together, they have the power. If he wanted absolute control, he'd have had 51% and given them 49% to share among themselves.
Becks recently bought his 10%, so I presume he's put some money in at least. I suspect what the billionaire can provide in money, the others provide in terms of connections, brand image etc. Nice combo, as along as he's not a Twit about it all, and seeing Scholes has already left one club because of a bell end owner, seems this guy keeps the business end of things to himself, and lets the rest of the board take care of the football. Win Win.

 

From revenue generated through various channels and Rupp’s pocket.

 

Even if they all vote together they can not out vote him.

 

Ah yes, Jamie Devitt

We can only hope!

 

Whys that according to that source they all have 10% of the club ?.

 

Reading back through some of the comments about kit colour, shares you lot think you know everything get your facts right boys, we know you lot are deluded but come on get the bacis right.

 

Well I am going to attempt to ask for clarification; firstly you are in the wrong thread, this is for the newly promoted Salford, and views as to whether any city fans will turn up at their place. Occasionally it goes off tangent, but generally all things Salford.

It is normal to point out inaccuracies as you have hinted at, try making it clear what facts fans on here have obviously in your view got wrong.

 

Not according to the articles logged at Companies House