McCall - Studio Guest Ban

The worst that will happen is the crowd will chant 'Stuart, Stuart'
Stuart will hold his hand up and then point at the pitch and the players in a motion to the crowd we have to get behind the team.
Knowing him I think he might feel slightly embarrassed by the whole issue.

It's bollocks there's a safety issue, it's Bradford City not West Ham or Blackpool and all the chanting of Stuarts name will only tell him and the chairmen we still love him.

 

Safety??? Sounds like an answer you'd give when you've been put on the spot, and just blurt out something, anything. I don't think Stuart's in any danger. Now as for others...

Kick-off approaches, the DJ plays some Tenpole Tudor: "Hoo-ra hoo-ra hoo-ra-ay, over the hills with the swords of a thousand men" rings out through VP. Suddenly, out of the mists appears Stu, claymore in hand, to lead the charge. The Shrews are put to the sword; Stu disappears back into the mists. The DJ plays "First we take VP, then we take League 1." Simon gives a positive post-match press conference, and all our fora settle down a bit.

RCB

 

I think quite a few will be in breach of health and safety if Stuart let's off a claymore. If he fires it towards the midland road it might disturb their sleep.........

 

Can we ban the word 'if' from posts? The eejits seem to think you can say anything as long as you put 'if' in there somewhere

 

bloody safety issue, name me one.. just one city fan who if they saw Stuart would not walk up to him and shake his hand!

EDIN OUT!

 

looks like Stuart has been confined to the South stand.. as far away from his Bradford hating fans as possible... what a joke..

EDIN OUT!

 

Shock and Awe! But it might still be a good idea to have a non-exploding back-up to hand...

Y'know, I was actually thinking about the historical Scots weapon, and had forgotten that a modern mine had the same name.

RCB

 

Maybe close season will be the time when truth comes out. Hendriie senior and McCall as well as the players may let down their professionalism.

 

The only thing he said was that the players must put their grievances aside and put in a performance. So nowt new as we all know that the players have a grievance for whatever issue.....

 

There is also a claymore explosive used by the army so that's what I eluded too .

 

I was really full of optimism when the new owners took charge I like the philosophy they have and I still think they have good intentions but by Christ someone needs to grab Edin by the scruff of the neck and tell him to think things through before he does stuff.

I can understand why he doesn't want him there we need DO to move on but he must have known even a hint of this would cause unrest. Trying to Stop Stuart coming to VP is plain stupid.

 

Brother in law is a Town fan, he’s just sent me this... interesting that other owners have this opinion

Huddersfield Chairman is on for a Q & A here...talking about Bradford. Just said that the owners have absolutely got the best interests of Bradford City at heart and that they are really good guys. He says he knows McCall had dinner with the players 3 days after his sacking which he thinks is incredibly disrespectful. He also thinks McCall being at the game the other night is totally wrong.....’he shouldn’t be anywhere near as it undermines the club and Simon Grayson.’ Says McCall has seriously gone down in his estimations.

 

Pretty strong words from a current chairman! To be honest like I said I can see why they didn't want him there and there is a part of me wondering why Stuart did it he must have known it would cause upset. I don't do Twitter and all that but I've just seen Jamie Lawrence has said 100% they tried to stop it happening so I've no doubt it did. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but they shouldn't have said anything just let it ride now.

Parker obviously has a little axe to grind now so for me that's a relationship that needs fixing quickly.

 

They all said they’ve heard it’s 100% true but then unwilling to expand.. for what it’s worth I imagine the club rang sky asking for someone else.. sky said no, this got out and was somehow twisted and the twisted version sent to Parker

 

If it wasn't Jamie I would still have my doubts about it. It's not a big leap to think that he just spoke to Stuart about it who told him what had gone on. I can't imagine he would put that in the public domain if he wasn't certain it was true.

 

I don't think anyone doubts that they want the best for the club. However they have severely underestimated what it takes for a club at this level to be successful