Liverpool or Chelsea?

Chelsea is the better option for players who are increasingly focused on short term success over building something (As shown by Bellingham, Reals midfield is so stacked that Camavinga gets played at Full Back more often than not yet he had gone there when there are clubs he could have walked in to and had the team built around but which may have taken 2 or 3 seasons to get to that level). Their 'project' just looks more appealing and like it will have quicker success. Liverpool's looks on the face of it like it will need more time even though we saw last season how spending big doesn't mean Chelsea will click (I actually think Poch might struggle, Chelsea right now have a PSG feel about them and he quickly lost the dressing room there. Players on big and long contracts often feel and actually have more power than the managers)