Liverpool or Chelsea?

I know who I would prefer to play for and it wouldn’t be Chelsea

 

They're both very similar so the club that's offered you the highest wage of you've got any sense.

 

Add into the mix the difference in lifestyle - London West End, or Liverpool. Its a draw for players.

 

Also throw into that history a passionate fan base. Of course rewards are very important but I am sure there will be little difference between clubs and some players will like tge high life of London Town. But I still know which club I would prefer to play for

 

Whilst no one can deny Liverpool’s history, younger people today(those of playing age) barely know football existed pre Premier League era. Every player who plays know will see Chelsea as the more successful club in their lifetime. I’m sorry but you’re looking at it all wrong, most people who are 30 or younger won’t fancy Liverpool over Chelsea. As has been proven by the latest signing today.

 

Remember the days when Chelsea were a league fixture at VP? Two hats then, two hats now. A plastic football club, especially when the money launderers took over. Arrogant sheets.

 

The 'passionate fanbase' thing with Liverpool is overstated. A handful of times a year, its an immense atmosphere, the rest of the time its as soulless as all other grounds. For an overseas player especially, they won't care about that anyway I wouldn't have thought, not as much as the stuff that has a bearing on their everyday lives. Its not for me either, but the glitz of the west end will be a big draw for young multi-millionaire men. And in football terms, there's every likelihood that Chelsea will fare better than Liverpool over the coming years, the way they're throwing money around.

 

Well they certainly didn’t last season or the last two or three.

 

It WILL end in tears, over time.

 

True, but I think they're building a hell of a squad and they now have a 'proper' manager. They were the better team against Liverpool at the weekend.

 

I went last year as the daughter has Liverpool as a "second team". Apart from the teams coming out it was silent for the most part and sat right at the top of the main stand you could hear certain songs being played over a PA system trying to get the crowd going.

It was weird and I had to check myself but it certainly wasn't a 'normal' crowd noise and had a 'tinny' sound so it was definitely an artificially generated noise.

 

Except of course Liverpool doing the cup double(fa and cabbage patch cups) over Chelsea very recently

 

A lot of kids these days though think that football didn't exist before the PL and with Chelsea winning it 5 times to Liverpool's 1 Chelsea certainly have the upper hand for the younger supporters.

 

Liverpool have the stronger brand according to this
https://www.90min.com/posts/50-most-valuable-football-club-brands-world-2023

 

I’m feeling fine.

Look, it’s simple. Saudi backed Chelsea are cheating and the PL, FIFA are letting them get away with it.

It’s the agents are that are not shocking choosing Chelsea. Why would you want to join a club with no history? Oh that’s right a 9 year contract!

Make no mistake Liverpool has messed up over the Last few weeks. Certainly with the Lavia deal and have been embarrassing but hey if you can’t see Chelsea and the London media are cheating then I can’t help you.

 

That also says Manchester City have a stronger brand than Barcelona, Real Madrid and Manchester United.

In short, it's b*blocks.

 

Manchester City are the most successful club in the world at the moment so that skews it Overall Real Madrid are number one. I think Liverpools position is about right