I'm gonna stick my neck on the line and say that taking Banks off isn't the reason we then conceded.
Everyone was sore at the time, and an attempt to see the game out with a more defensive unit obviously didn't work out the way Hughes wanted.
But it wasn't the substitution that made that happen. I'm surprised this hysteria hasn't died down a little since then. The substitution just limited our chances of getting back into the game, which we clearly shouldn't have had to do with an extra defender on the pitch in the first place.
We aren't in League Two because we took Banks off for a few minutes ahead of a potential date at Wembley FFS.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
-
Welcome to Bantam Talk
Why not register for an account?Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads
-
Dismiss Notice
Premium Membership now Available
Please see this thread for more details
The Voice - Match preview Most liked posts in thread: Carlisle United vs Bradford City Saturday 20th May 2023 @ 3:00pm
Page 52 of 52
-
JonButterfield Star PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
-
-
JonButterfield Star PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
If we hadn't made that sub, I can't imagine Banks would have somehow prevented Carlisle scoring.
I know why it was unpopular, but let's be honest that sub =/= losing. -
-
XCIV_Bantam Squad PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Euro 2020
"Marxist scheme" yeah sure mate, interesting what people come up with to try and justify behavior -
Birky Bantam Impact SubP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
-
-
Rogered Tart Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
-
As for scoring morality points, I haven’t got time for petty games mate -
Rogered Tart Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
-
donhutchinsaffro Regular StarterP.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter
But we shouldnt be should we? We need to get out of tin pot khazi bab league. Fordy sort it out mate.
-
In a charge letter dated 21 June 2023 The Football Association (“The FA”) alleged that Carlisle United, during the EFL League Two match against Bradford City on 26 December 2022, failed to ensure spectators and/or supporters (and anyone purporting to be its supporters or followers) conducted themselves in an orderly fashion whilst attending the match.
Accordingly, The FA charged Carlisle United with:
- “Failing on 26/12/22 to ensure that spectators and/or supporters (and anyone purporting to be its supporters or followers) conduct themselves in an orderly fashion whilst attending the match and do not use words or otherwise behave in a way which is improper, offensive, abusive, indecent, or insulting with either express or implied reference to race contrary to rule E21.1 of the Rules of the Football Association;
- In addition, The FA alleged that the words and/or behaviour made reference to race contrary to FA rule E21.4.
The club admitted the charge in correspondence dated 27/6/23.
The FA Commission concluded it was appropriate and proportionate to issue a financial sanction of £7,500.
In addition, it imposed that an Action Plan in accordance with Annex 1 to the Policy and Guidance was necessary in this case, in order to reduce the risk of further such breaches of FA rule E21.
Carlisle United Football Club was formally warned as to future conduct.
Page 52 of 52