Biden was right and it is the correct policy, Someone has to explain why the US thought and paid for an Afghan army of 300,00 to defend the country when those who know the inside of the Afghan army claim it was only in fact 50,000 strong and on the verge of defeat anyway
Those MPs making fine speeches saying about going back to help should go back themselves first rather than sending others to die in a country already lost while they make long speeches about what others should do,
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
-
Welcome to Bantam Talk
Why not register for an account?Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads
-
Dismiss Notice
Premium Membership now Available
Please see this thread for more details
Most liked posts in thread: Afghanistan
Page 2 of 3
-
If you choose to turn and run then own it don't start implying that people who had fought and died under your flag showed cowardice when you're the one turning tail.
Also make sure you're leaving people who were helping you are going to be okay.
I actually have no issue with them withdrawing in general (I hope they remember it the next time they want to start chucking their weight around but probably wont) but it's the lack of planning execution and the poor rhetoric that is really annoying to me.trevor likes this. -
The only option the President has to take unilateral actions is an executive order and those have restrictions for when they can be used. Most of the time it’s a battle for them to get things passedStop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...Storck likes this. -
ConnecticutBantam Impact SubP.L. 21/22 Entrant P.L. 20/21 Entrant
Apparently big issues between the Brits and the US on the group out there. Paras have been going into Kabul to get our people - and other nations citizens. The US apparently worried about upsetting the TB by leaving the airport.
Offside likes this. -
But he can at least try to do the right thing and if he gets bogged down in the complex processes then so be it.
But just watch these interviews which are 6 weeks apart.
This is not a President who has been tied in knots by a bureaucratic process. It's a President that has gone down the route that he wanted, underestimated the enemy and is now coming across as uncaring.
Then this morning he's rather chillingly said..."If there's American citizens left, we're gonna stay to get them all out," I would hope what he actually meant is 'Americal allies" because if they start pulling up the drawbridge before all of our people are out then we might have a massive issue.
Imagine if other presidents had responded to people falling from planes with "Ah yeah but that was 5 day ago" or said that this type of chaos was inevitable and built in to the decision making a month after saying it wouldn't happen.Bronco likes this. -
Nearly 100,000 airlifted from Kabul airport but now reports the one we actually went to evacuate such as interpreters and those others working for UK government or our forces are in danger of been left behind,
The word shambles comes to mind as thousands of economic migrants are airlifted out and those we went for are left to the fate of the TalibanAaron Baker likes this. -
Tony Wilkinson Squad PlayerP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 10
Isis-k attacking the Taliban....!!
What a wonderful world...Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...Bronco likes this. -
Offcomedun Important PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter Euro2020 Winner Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 3rd PlaceBronco likes this.
-
NorthernMonkey Squad PlayerP.L. 20/21 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
It's a very sad state of affairs indeed. I've been on holiday this last week and not seen much of it so wondered if Biden is getting hammered for it and if there are the inevitable "wouldn't have happened under Trump" comparisons?
I've certainly no point to make as I haven't read or seen enough of it so I'm massively uninformed but I just wondered what other people's thoughts were without politicising it, if it's possible. -
In my view his speech last night was disgrace and the USA equivalent of a Little Englander but others will have loved it. I don't know how any country who goes into coalition with the USA in the future can have trust that they won;t just cut and run if they need to focus more at home.
The thing is though that there is so much blame to go around that almost every stance can be taken in good faith and justified. Basically every President in the last 2 decades of both colours have lied about the situation in Afghanistan and all involved have made terrible decisions. I just wish the response was more consistent rather than through the lens of whether the decision makes was Republican or Democrat. -
Tony Wilkinson Squad PlayerP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 10Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
-
I suspect the reason the Afghan forces did not fight when the US troops left them was simply that Afghanistan is a Muslim country, The Afghan army are Muslim, The Taliban are Muslim,
-
ConnecticutBantam Impact SubP.L. 21/22 Entrant P.L. 20/21 Entrant
Lots of British vets in particular coming out and saying the slander from Biden towards to Afghan forces was ridiculous. Easy for westerners to sit there and say "the Afghans never fought for their freedom"... Yet when retired servicemen are coming out and defending the ANA you have to realize something was wrong from the start.
-
I find it amazing that the powers that be US, UK, EU etc are surprise how little resistance (if any) was put up against the Taliban.
Listening to the Taliban leader they say it will be a different Taliban this time, they will allow females to go to school but only up to the age of 12, and they will still cut limbs off for thieves and stone (I assume women) for adultery. -
There is also the fact that the pullout is all Trump doing and even if Biden had wanted to he couldn't have stopped it as the house and its Trumpites would have almost certainly blocked it. He might have been able to issue an executive order to stop it but having checked that up I'm getting different answers to if he can in situations like this. As such if you want to be negative of Biden about this its hard to be really tough on him without the shadow of Trump derailing the articleStop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand... -
Offcomedun Important PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter Euro2020 Winner Euro 2020 P.L. 20/21 3rd Place
-
When the US removed those key aspects they were basically back to being an armed militia who were at a disadvantage to the Taliban despite lesser numbers.
But as a general point you're quite right in that it's easy for politicians to make decisions on war when they're not going. It's why the guys with knowledge of military operations who spoke today were so impressive. Once you have people there you should see it through though rather than leaving the people you're fighting in a stronger position than when you started and leaving people who have supported you to their fate. -
Biden knew what defeat looked like and was brave enough to tak the right decision, It has saved many many lives
Read this from the New York Times,
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/world/asia/afghanistan-rapid-military-collapse.html -
- There are still enough Trumpites to kill any Bill via the attachment of amendments. It's one of the most common way bills are killed by attaching amendments, often on something unconnected that you know the other side can't agree to.
- The American people were largely in favour of the pull out, especially in Red states so no republican can really break rank but also in many close democratic states meaning many of them to have little choice to cross the aisle especially those in the house and the senates who are in year 5 of their 6 year term as by this point they are having to think about their re-election (in fact even those in year 3 are likely to be having an eye on 2024's re-election run)
Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand... -
Unless the senate and Congress are writing his speeches as well?
I agree it will go down pretty well in the insular parts of America (I mentioned it was a ll a little bit "Little Englander" but that's the actual worry when so much of our policy is intrinsically tied to their capabilities. An MP said on TV this morning that Trump was overtly 'America First' but Biden is actually coming across as 'America Only'.
Page 2 of 3