Charlie

It's irrelevant. The money is guaranteed as we'd be a football creditor.

 

We need to buy 2 stickers now if Charlie gets sold or not.
Unless he actually signs.
If we plan on getting rid of him in jan it will put us in the same situation as last season and could feck us over again.

 

So the injury was legit. That shuts a lot of us up and some apologies should be sent Wyke's way on twitter.

 

https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/section-6---players/
All in section 49 Transfer/Compensation Fees - Method of Payment

 

All of the fees we have paid and recieved so far have been relatively small, so the method of payment becomes considerably less significant. However, paying fees of £1M + is a different ball game altogether and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if the adopted method was to adjust when you take certain factors into consideration, which wouldn't have otherwise existed when paying a smaller transfer fee. For example, club A want to get rid of a particular player, club B will take him but can only afford to do it over a longer period of time thus an agreement to pay the fee over the length of the players contract is agreed. Or in this case, Sunderland are in urgent need of a striker but we are aware that a replacement isn't going to come cheap, so an upfront payment is made so both teams get their wish.

Etc etc.

We can all come up with our theories but none of us really know. Is it common for a fee to be paid upfront, does it get paid over the entire length of a contract or perhaps there's a middle ground where fees are paid over the space of a year/a year and a half. Whichever one you believe in It's all conjecture as there's no strong evidence either way. At a guess, I think it will vary from transfer to transfer but back to Charlie Wyke, we shouldn't sell him unless Sunderland (or another club) provide us with enough resources up front to find an adequate repalcement. The biggest concern at the moment is the time issue. I can see a similar scenario to the farce we saw in Janaury where we are scrambling around for a replacement at the last minute, so hopefully his future is resolved quickly.

 

The best was the Wells money. it was like it never existed lol Turned to ether

 

Sorry if I doubted your integrity Charlie, get well soon. xxxx

 

If they go totally bust and drop out of the league then we would lose out on any unpaid money, but that is the only way. Football debts have to be paid in full. If they default then payments from TV etc are used in first instance.

 

No 2

 

Beginning with the letter D no doubt

 

What about 3.

 

No, just 2.

2 quality forwards not loans or pub players.

2 top forwards.

 

Should be a doddle , there's loads of them about.

 

This is not quite true, Whilst the football league have this stipulation in their rules the law of the land over rules these regulations, When Bates was at Leeds he refused to pay the football debts and lumped them with all the other debts for the receiver to deal with, The football league could not stop it and instead issued a 12 point deduction the following season as a penalty ( My memory says 12 but may have been more )

 

Get down to WH Smiths. Panini do five in a pack for a quid. Job done.

 

Get all the money upfront, forcing them to go bust, then take Charlie back paying the administrators 1p in the £1. Win Win

 

I wonder why.

 

Sunderland now in for Devante Cole. Wonder if this is to play with Wyke or they are moving on?

They seem adamant he is out for 6 weeks too Wyke. No idea where that’s come from

 

I reckon we're stuck with him now...probably to go in January for 100/150K
Shame 'cos I guess neither club or Charlie will be happy about that....