Quantcast
  1. Welcome to Bantam Talk

    Why not register for an account?

    Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads

  2. Premium Membership now Available


    Please see this thread for more details

    Dismiss Notice

The frightening increase in losses in lower league football continues

Discussion in 'City Talk' started by Jordan, Feb 18, 2026.

  1. Robert Molenaar

    Robert Molenaar Fringe Player

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2018
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    595
    It'll be interesting to see how much City lose for this first year back in League 1, guess we won't find out until next years accounts.

    Wild guess is £3million (below the league average?) - how long can Rupp continue to fund that without getting external investors in?
     
  2. Bronco

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    42,817
    Likes Received:
    49,974
    I'm sure the Human Rights people would be involved if a situation like that was ever tried to be implemented, I don't know how fans of certain Premiership clubs can afford season tickets : Ranked: The most expensive Premier League season tickets in 2025/26
     
  3. Polo-Bantam

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2018
    Messages:
    1,518
    Likes Received:
    1,761
    Did we get parachute payment, when relegated from premier league?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Onside

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    11,115
    Likes Received:
    19,460
    Yes we did, but nothing like they get today.
     
    Bronco likes this.
  5. WIBSEY GAWBER

    WIBSEY GAWBER Fringe Player

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2018
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    143
    No its not. Those players went through the wringer as kids at club academies. Clubs are always scouting so if they find a kid they like more its down the road you go. If they get a new coach they run the risk of no longer being favoured and down the road they go. When they get to 16 and at a lower league academy they run the risk of being replaced by ex prem league cast offs. They then have to prove themselves through late teens missing out on job or apprentice opportunities. Any player who makes it even at semi pro level deserves what they can get for all that mental anguish.
     
    Hulmebantam likes this.
  6. Klaatu

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    3,790
    We got enough to buy a parachute.. which failed to deploy.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    13,540
    Likes Received:
    28,071
    Mental anguish because they weren't considered good enough to play the sport at a professional level and had to get out into the real world of employment? That's just life and I'm sure given the time again, they'd all choose to have a go at the football route, just incase they made it.
     
    Interested Bystander likes this.
  8. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    13,540
    Likes Received:
    28,071
    Offered with no strings attached.
     
    Onside, andyc, Bronco and 1 other person like this.
  9. Tennesseebantam

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2018
    Messages:
    4,338
    Likes Received:
    5,654
    I thought was the dodgy Tampax deal.
     
  10. SimonW

    Staff Member Admin Moderator ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    7,780
    Likes Received:
    5,467
    First of all blaming the Premier League for inflating transfer fees and wages across Europe is just crazy bullshit that only makes sense in your head but hey that's par for the course with you. For most of the Premier Leagues existence it was SPAIN who were paying more in transfer fees and wages largely due to 3 things
    • Spanish banks were pretty much forced to give them interest free loans by the Government & Royal Family which the clubs would barely pay any off and then the banks would write them off around the time of the next club president election. For example Santander funded Real's summer splurge on Ronaldo, Kaka, Benzema and Alonso. This only stopped when the Spanish Economy got in such a state that the banks couldn't justify it and it became more important to keep the banks liquid rather than prop up Football clubs. Real actual adapted to this fairly well, Barca kept acting like they had all this free money which is why they are arguably the club in the most financial trouble of any club in the whole world (and just to register all these players they have bought despite having no money they have had to sell so many assets for fairly low prices that gets them a short term influx of cash to register players but in 5-10 years time when they have nothing else to sell and the holders of then rights they have sold will have already made their money back while Barca are losing out on hundred of millions a year)

    • Dodgy land deals from national and local government. Again for example we have Real who sold their training ground to the local governement for £278million. They bought a much bigger piece of land for a new training ground for a fraction of the price. In addition the local gov gave them a plot of land next to the stadium valued at £480k which they then realised they didn't have the right to give away and said Real had to sell kit back to them. It was valued at £22million

    • They had this famous loophole in their tax that was dubbed the Beckham law but was actually in place before Beckham moved to Spain. For foreigners it exempted you from paying tax on any income not earned in Spain and alot of income for sports stars and other celebs make is deemed to be foreign earning including image rights. It's only really wages for footballers that counted. And the law included provisions for Spanish earned income as well, Spains tax rate was 45% but under this deal they paid 24%. Man Utd and Real both had bids for Benezma accepted for example and both offered around the same top line wage to him but because of the tax situation he got significantly more as his take home. This is actually the law that when Spain became skint the government started taking football players and other celebs like Shakira to court claiming they committed tax evasion despite it being legal and they all buckled and paid massive fines so as not to risk prison. Madrid actually enacted a similar law recently to help Real sign Mbappe where if he makes financial investment such as shares over a certain amount in qualifying companies for 5 years at the end of it when he can apply for resident status he will get a rebate of 20% of the tax he has paid.

    And what the top 6 spends has very little impact on you. Again if you actually look in the Championship its the Parachute payment clubs who are generally paying the highest wages when they sign players BECAUSE they have 40mill as reward fro being failures

    And you might want to pay attention to the saying 'People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' as Bradford City as as big a parasite of a club as anyone. I say that based on the following two things
    • It's been reported that City along with the other EFL clubs in levels much lower than they should be based on the size of the club are pushing the most for the removal of the 3PM blackout despite the negative impact that would have lower down. And there has been absolutely no indication of the EFL promising a fund for lower levels to help non-league that would be impacted even though these same clubs are constantly screaming about the big bad PL not gibing them enough handouts

    • The PPV situation during Covid and since. The fact that almost all purchase income from Away fans went to the Away team was vastly unfair and unbalancing. You were probably selling more away passes in a single game than the home team made across 10 home matches. If you want to talk about greed the bigger clubs if they weren't so greedy would have been happy to settle on all away PPV sales being split 50/50 between clubs as that would have been the fair way to do it. Those with more fans would still benefit like they do nromally but you aren't effectively having 24 home games in a season.
    There is greed at every level and blaming it all own the top 6 is just lazy and blinkered. There was almost certainly some elements of self interest in Project Big Picture as well but it absolutely would have removed the situation where some clubs constantly have tens of millions extra revenue and in general spend a much higher percentage of their revenue on wages because they just grab the cash while yo-yoing

    No they were introduced in 2006. I can't find what it was then but it was only for 2 years rather than 3 and you got a reduced amount if you were only in the Premier League for a single season back then. In the late 2010's it was changed to 3 years but you only got 3 if you were in the PL for 2 or more consecutive seasons. It's now 3 for everyone. And in 2015 they got around £14mill in the first season, it's now pushing £50m. The problem is it requires so few votes to stop a motion in the Premier league that you always get the relegation risk teams 'We don't like it but here's a parachute payment amendment to the motion which will make us vote yes and it just keeps getting extended. One of the reasons it was initially added was because the plan was always for the PL to be 18 team, the initial reduction was voted through at the intended time but the next reduction kept getting voted down and this was the sweetner to clubs at risk as they would get a cash injection which would help them come right back up.

    What you did get was the solidarity payments there to help the lower league teams out but everyone in the Championship got the same. You also got 2 years of PL money to further help if it wasn't all wasted
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. Offcomedun

    P.L. 20/21 3rd Place ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2018
    Messages:
    7,550
    Likes Received:
    13,722
    Obviously I’m pleased for my son in law that he can earn £400 for a few hours work on a Saturday afternoon, to supplement his salary from his full time career as a manager in Tesco’s head office.

    But my point was that I’m surprised that a tier nine club with crowds of a few hundred per game can afford to pay him that much per game. They must be being heavily subsidised by the owner, which was the point of this thread.

    And, incidentally, he never came through an academy. He went to Loughborough Uni (where he played for their first team) and then into full time IT employment, which he combined with training two evenings a week and playing on Saturdays. He twice achieved promotion to National League/the Conference but both times got displaced by ex league players and quickly.dropped back down to tier six clubs.
     
  12. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    13,540
    Likes Received:
    28,071
    As I know you like posting stats and data, here's a few from the BBC football site.

    Based on data from the last decade, English Premier League clubs have significantly outspent Spanish La Liga clubs, with the gap in transfer market investment growing wider, especially since 2020. The Premier League's spending has dominated European football, often exceeding the combined spending of other top leagues, while La Liga has focused more on financial sustainability.

    Key Spending Trends (2015–2025)
    Financial Dominance: Between 2010 and 2019, the Premier League spent more than double that of La Liga. In the period from 2015–2024, Premier League clubs had a net spending (money spent minus money earned) of over -€11 billion, compared to significantly lower spending in Spain.
    Recent Gaps: In recent transfer windows (e.g., Summer 2024), the financial disparity has become even more pronounced. In 2024, Premier League clubs invested roughly €2.57 billion, while Spanish clubs maintained much more modest, controlled spending.

    The Post-COVID Shift: The 2020/2021 period marked a major divergence. While English clubs continued to spend, La Liga saw a sharp 37% decrease in investment compared to 2019, heavily driven by the financial constraints of Barcelona and Real Madrid.
    Top Spenders: In the last five years (2020–2025), Premier League teams have dominated the top of the spending charts, with Chelsea (over €1.7B in 5 years) and Manchester United often leading the way, surpassing the top Spanish spenders.

    English Premier League clubs also spent significantly more on transfers in total between 2000 and 2010 compared to Spanish La Liga clubs.
    Data indicates that, looking at cumulative spending since 2000, the Premier League outspent Spain's La Liga by more than 2 to 1.


    So in summary, that's at least 26 years of the 33 years of the PLs existence that it's been heavily outspending La Liga and I imagine will continue for the next 26 years but yeah, it's all been Spanish led for the "majority of the PLs existence" :joy::joy:
     
    #32 NorthernMonkey, Feb 19, 2026
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2026
    Parader likes this.
  13. Hulmebantam

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    24,245
    Likes Received:
    33,475
    It can be a bit more insidious than that though. I'm not close to junior football, but I saw it from the other side when I taught in primary schools.

    I've mentioned this before, but Manchester City provide sports services to a lot of schools. The kids love the association etc, but at the same time the drive is there to scout the best players as young as possible. I knew a young lad, very decent footballer who was playing at Manchester City. They decided to release him two weeks before sitting his SATs (a separate debate about their relevance), but despite being asked by the school and his parents to delay it, the kid was released. He was devastated. I'm sure he has recovered now, and yes you can argue that's life, but that still doesn't sit well with me as a responsible way to deal with children especially when it impacts their education.

    Slightly differently, I also taught a young lad who was an outstanding footballer and the big clubs were falling over themselves to sign him. He had a day out with his family to see the first team train at Liverpool, he had a kick around with Zlatan when he went to Manchester United etc- I saw the mobile recording of it. A huge amount of effort was put in to get the family to agree to which team they would sign with. He was only 8 years old. It looks as though he could make as he is now doing very well at Manchester United - you can look up Edson Manchester United on YouTube.

    My point is that because it is football, which millions love and the potential financial benefits from participating are life-changing, there is a dark side to how the industry engages with children in the hope of long-term financial reward which tends to get ignored.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    13,540
    Likes Received:
    28,071
    I completely agree but this is hardly a secret anymore in a cut throat business and children entering academies should be made very aware by the parents that it's a very, very low percentage that will make it through and ensure the relevant back up plans are in place for the inevitable 'bad news'.

    Of course that's easier said than done and the kids minds will likely be solely on a career in football but it's still a business and just like working for any company these days, you're only a number and only valued until the moment you're not.

    It's not just PL academies these days though, it's even clubs in the NL like Park Avenue. They use the governement funded "apprenticeship" schemes where kids of any footballing level can pick up a trade qualification (that generally is only a very basic entry level certificate) alongside training and playing football for PA 5 times a week. They use these kids to bulk up the numbers, knowing full well they aren't anywhere near the required level but ensure game time for the 1 or possibly 2 that they might be interested in taking on.

    These kids are then released on mass after 2/3 years with a meaningless qualification and behind in the job market but the kids get to pretend they'll be footballers for a few years and I imagine the government fills its quota of giving young people "trade skills" while artificially keeping the unemployment numbers lower.
     
    Hulmebantam likes this.
  15. andyc

    andyc Impact Sub

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    10,570
    Here we go again
    These poor professionals football players, forced to do something that most fans can’t only dream of and all for a pittance and having to retire in their mid 30’s
    I know lots are not on vast sums, but even their wages are far better than the average working person and it’s not like it’s hard labour
     
  16. SimonW

    Staff Member Admin Moderator ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    7,780
    Likes Received:
    5,467
    But according to you it's not the whole of the premier league it's just the big bad big 6 who want to destroy the angel club that is Bradford City and every other club in the world.

    While La Liga has tried to make things a bit fairer the TV deal and the Prize money is still massively in favour of the big 3. For example while 63% of the TV money in the Premier League is split evenly between the clubs it's only 50% in La Liga. And both the TV split for the other 50% and the Prize money has a much bigger drop off per position in La Liga. 1st place despite having a much smaller Domestic TV deal gets more than the Champions in the Premier League but last place in the PL gets significantly more than last place in the La Liga. It's the same with the International deals as well.

    They also don't have a shared marketing setup. While Premier League club can and do their own marketing and licensing deals they also have to grant the league a non-exclusive right and the league will sell naming, data and image rights to companies as a league package which is then split evenly. La Liga its all on the clubs own backs which see's 60% of all commercial income being generated by the top 3. The premier Leagues is much closer

    And not only that but ELEVEN of the clubs collect less prize and tv money than the relegated 3 in the premier league get in parachute payments so if you are in the bottom half you have to be safer with your spend. The Top 3 though don't.

    I would point out that Reals wage bill is larger than any club in the Premier League. And Barca's despite the financial issues and restrictions they are in spend more on wages than Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea.

    Sure post Covid their transfer spend has dropped especially Barca but they were regularly outspending the Big 6 before that. And we still saw Barca spending around 160m & 110m since the covid season despite the fact they couldn't even get the players registered due to wage restrictions without offloading players, taking players out of their squad (which is so stupid because they still have to pay them) or getting their existing players to defer wages. And Real have spent north of 160m in 2 of the last three season. And thats with both using Loans more and also making targets aware they want them so they run their contracts down so they can sign them for free but on massively inflated wages
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. NorthernMonkey

    NorthernMonkey Squad Player

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Messages:
    13,540
    Likes Received:
    28,071
    Wow, you really are big in to conspiracy theories. No one said anything of the sort.

    This is quickly developing into the same sensationalist nonsense you peddled on the Isreali fans (which was proven factually wrong but you still refused to accept) so on that note I'll bow out and leave you to the tinfoil.
     
    Parader, Bronco and Rogered Tart like this.
  18. Captain Grumpy

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    2,756
    Likes Received:
    5,314
    We did I think about 5 million but it got immediately swallowed up by the excessive debts we built up on crazy salaries and ground development debts. We got relegated in a disastrous financial position described by Gordon Taylor of the PFA as the worst financial crisis he had seen. It was later beaten by Leeds Utd a couple of years later.
     
    Bronco and Kevin1954 like this.
  19. Kevin1954

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    28,318
    Likes Received:
    25,673
    Arnt the PFA and player wage “ demands” the largest drivers of club debt …Ironic he should say such a thing?
     
  20. Bronco

    ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    42,817
    Likes Received:
    49,974
    They always have to trump us ;).
     
    Captain Grumpy likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice