Quantcast
  1. Welcome to Bantam Talk

    Why not register for an account?

    Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads

  2. Premium Membership now Available


    Please see this thread for more details

    Dismiss Notice

Bye bye 3.00

Discussion in 'City Talk' started by AJP, Jan 16, 2026.

  1. Dennis

    Staff Member Moderator Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    18,227
    The broadcasters are not alone in resisting it but they have seen how technology allows matches to be streamed illegally in their entirety. There are millions around the world who would rather pay criminal gangs to steal the broadcasts for them in return for a small fee rather than pay for a legal stream. It's not in the interests of legitimate broadcasters to broadcast further when the criminals are the ones reaping the rewards financially whilst the Sky's of the world would be expected to recompense clubs for reduced attendances if that were the case.

    As I said earlier, change will only come about if the evidence can be provided to demonstrate that the football industry in its entirety would be better off if more games were televised. I can't speak for others but I'm not aware that such evidence exists. There are simply too many vested interests to change the current arrangements without a proper understanding of the implications. It won't happen based on a wing and a prayer. That's irrespective of what fans might want.
     
    Klaatu likes this.
  2. JonButterfield

    Supporter World Cup 26 ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    17,231
    Likes Received:
    29,240
    The evidence is that attendances continue to rise year on year at all levels regardless of the increase in the number of televised games.

    Beyond that, I'm not sure what kind of evidence we would need?

    The idea attendances drop due to televised screenings is incorrect.
     
  3. Dennis

    Staff Member Moderator Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    18,227
    I have no idea whether televising 3pm kick-offs has any impact or not on attendances. The fact that attendances are simply increasing over time neither supports nor undermines that unless some kind of causal link can be established. It's a very simplistic view compsred to the complexity of the decision making by some competing interests.

    What is more relevant is whether televising 3pm games produces more financial and economic benefits to the football sector or not. If it's true then at thst point the extra spoils can be shared so nobody loses out. Only when there is evidence to support that will those who make the broadcasting decisions sit up and take notice. In the mean time, I expect things will continue as they are whatever we fans might prefer.
     
  4. JonButterfield

    Supporter World Cup 26 ⚽ P.L.25/26 Entrant

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    17,231
    Likes Received:
    29,240
    Maybe.

    Although I think as fans, we should all be asking for every game to be shown, and ultimately fan power is what pays the bills for all the people involved in football - except those ultra-"benevolent" owners haha
     
  5. Storck

    Storck Regular Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2018
    Messages:
    40,321
    Likes Received:
    31,231
    I think the next change will be that lower leagues will be shown with the Championship and PL keeping the blackout. They will then look at how that effects attendance at both the games shown and also other games that kick off at 3pm lower down the pyramid. Then roll it to the Championship and then to the PL. It is all in the hands of the EFL and PL
     
    AJP and JonButterfield like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice