Most liked posts in thread: Matty Foulds to Harrogate on loan (with Poll)

No idea, I never used the word lazy anywhere, in any comment. If MH told the truth I don’t see a problem really?

 

We gave his a 2 year deal on 18 May 2022.

 

Oh ..where?

 

Why bring a left back in if you are not going to play him. We already have a good player in Ridhual but Hughes wanted a player of his choice and may have given gaurantees the loaner will be first choice as is often the case. Players need to know the manager has confidence in them to hang around. Hughes actions made it clear he would be second choice and not in his plans. Most players would leave given the option under the circumstances and Hughes knew this after all his years in the game.. He is been unfair and aittle underhand and while he may fool a few supporters the players will have taken note of how he handles things for the future

 

Agreed, I used to like the side of the fence that wasn't scared of cartoon poo emojis and the hats off thread.

 

Yeah but it's a bit like AFC Wimbledon claiming the credit for winning the FA Cup.

 

Few posts up where you say ‘that type of attitude’ and label him a ‘sulk’…..based on nothing.

I’d say the opposite is actually true. He had to bide his time last year when Ridehalgh was playing well and he didn’t sulk, or spit his dummy out, as another poster has suggested he’s done here

 

So I ask again, where did I use the word lazy. Don’t put words into my mouth please. I am more than happy to attribute anything I say , when I did actually say it. I ain’t shy.

WHERE?.

 

Christ Kev, chill out! Get a pint down ya.

As I’ve already clarified, I said you and Karl are making lazy accusations about Foulds’ attitude being poor - based on little evidence and only your own assumptions. I never said you called the player lazy. Read the thread back.

anyway, have a good night fella!

 

Foulds had played every game for months at left back, someone comes in on loan and he's wanting out. Before a ball is kicked.

 

Are you saying we are a weakened team without Foulds ?

 

Depends how good his replacement is. However we do need a quicker and better full back on the other side. Haliday is noticeably slow and teams target him which has cost us goals

 

Plus if Ridehalgh does come back fighting fit I believe as he was our first choice LB he would be Hughes preferred player in that position, I believe (could be wrong) when he went to Everton they played him as a CD it was originally where he played at City until he was moved to LB and did a reasonable job because his strength is as a defender.

 

Are you suggesting Hughes allowed the wrong full back currently playing, to leave. ie He should have allowed Halliday to go on loan instead.
Don’t hide behind whataboutism…who is the better of the two. Make your mind up time.

 

And if the new guy gets here and has an attitude or can't be arsed.....or isn’t as good as everyone thinks he is. Just my opinion. Not saying Matty has an attitude problem, just that it seems a rash decision

 

It's pretty clear in my reply to anyone who is not trying to be obtuse. Haliday is not good enough and if we are looking to replace a full back should be replaced before Fould's especially as Fould's can cover other positions. However long term both full backs need replacing if we are to improve

 

Thanks for proving my point. If you only knew son.

 

OK Mr Grumpy.

 

The picture says it all..... feel sorry for the lad