There's a lot of detail here so I'll stick to the main points.
Bottom line is the club made a loss of £299k in the 21/22 season. For some reason, the club prefers to call that a deficit
That's simply the difference between its total revenues of £7.3m and its total costs of £7.6m. The deficit has improved significantly on the previous season when it was £845k but of course that was seriously impacted by Covid. At the end of the day, it's the size of the loss or deficit which illustrates how well the club performs financially. Over time, continuing to run up losses can't be sustained unless it is supported by its owner. The alternative is to improve the commercial revenues or reduce the club's costs.
There are some interesting comments from Alan Biggin on players costs. He says quite correctly that we are well within the SCMP wages cap. It's described in a positive way which helps to explain why our playing budget continues to reduce in real terms every season. We're clearly getting better at keeping within the SCMP wages year on year! For a football club with promotion aspirations, I don't regard it as a positive at all since it is a major determinand of the quality of the playing squad. But that might just be my thinking.
There's a passing comment on the loan provided by Rupp. It confirms that it is £1.7m (and not the figure quoted above in another post) as I've said previously and it was provided before Covid impacted when Rahic was doing his thing. We'll have to wait until the next results are published in Apr 24 to see whether any part of the loan has been paid back during last season.
It's a long piece of analysis from Alan Biggins which is encouraging in that the club is becoming more open about its financial position. I trust this continues. There's some serious slapping of backs in some parts which I don't intend to comment on further!
If there are specific issues where you need further explanation, let me know and I'll try to explain.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Oh man! Ad-blocking software has been detected! :'(
This website is run by the community, for the community... and it needs advertisements in order to keep running.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
Please disable your ad-block, or become a premium member to hide all advertisements and this notice.
-
Welcome to Bantam Talk
Why not register for an account?Not only can you then get fully involved in the community but you also get fewer ads
-
Dismiss Notice
Premium Membership now Available
Please see this thread for more details
Most liked posts in thread: City financial report
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Rogered Tart, Botswana Bantam and Onside like this.
-
Park bantam Regular StarterP.L.22/23 Entrant
Turnover increased by 42% that is some going
Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...AJP and Bantam Boy like this. -
JimmyBantam Impact SubP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
What would be interesting to know is what is the committed expenditure against optional. A large turnover can give you great flexibility. -
Keefly Bantam Important PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 20Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...Onside and borderlescott like this.
-
Ulysses S Grant Squad PlayerP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant
Raised turner gives a bigger baseline for FFP, not that we spend what we can.
Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...Hulmebantam and Dennis like this. -
@Loyalbantam makes a good point. These financial highlights relate to the 21/22 season. Lots of things will have changed since then. The accounts for last season (22/23) should have been prepared by now but for some reason, the club always waits until the Companies House final deadlne before publishing them at the end of March. Shortly after that deadline in early April 24, the club will publish the latest selected highlights. These highlights show more detail than the the published accounts (which is a good thing). It's always interesting however what is omitted from these 'selected' highlights compared to what the accounts themselves show, such as the club's debt!Rogered Tart likes this. -
Loyalbantam Squad PlayerP.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter
although this looks to be an old document -
Compared to the last full, pre pandemic season we lost £300k of which paying off Adams was a major factor .
Total debt it appears to be just £1.1 m ( See below)
Loan from Rupp of £1.2m approx has yet to be paid back.
Think that’s right. -
-
It won’t be a pretty read this years. Even with the sale of mummy’s boy Lewis and Young.
-
-
-
Park bantam Regular StarterP.L.22/23 EntrantStop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
-
-
Captain Grumpy Impact SubP.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter
That account was published in April last year covering the 21/22 season it’s an old news report. In April this year we should get the 22/23 season accounts
-
These are out of date accounts. The only thing of note is whether the £299k deficit carried forward has since shrunk or grown! And of particular interest is if Hughes leaving has had as much a financially negative impact as it is now clear Adams' departure did.
-
Keefly Bantam Important PlayerQatar 2022 Entrant P.L.22/23 Entrant P.L.23/24 Entrant Supporter P.L. 20/21 Top 20Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
-
-
Page 1 of 2