The right decision?

From the 4 players we’ve released or sent back- is there anyone we should have signed permanently?

Cooke- Probably the best of the bunch. Our best midfield player, often being asked to play in a role he wasn’t accustomed to thanks to Bowyer, has talent, might go on to do better elsewhere and yet it’s all if and buts isn’t it. Might have done this and that if so and so happened. Can’t remember many stand out games to make him a ‘must sign’.

Conclusion- Not arsed either way.

Connelly- Put teams on the back foot, frightening pace but little end product and very inconsistent.

Conclusion: Probably wasn’t on much so sign up as a back up winger depending on the Ismail situation.

DMH- Is Mottley-Henry a homegrown player and is he the reason Devine was being kept out of the match day squad? If the answer is yes then we should have signed him as he’s better than Devine. If not then we were right to get rid. Strange signing.

Devitt- Have nothing to say.

Your thoughts?

 

I’m guessing every other club in the same position have sent their loan players packing then? A quick look suggests that’s not the case. This appears to be a choice made by the club but happy to be shown something which suggests otherwise.