Most liked posts in thread: SKY News

Damm, rumpled

 

Reckon I could still do a job for City

 

Wouldn’t have thought so, tubby

 

Thank you..

 

Be careful what you wish for !!!!

 

CEO or CCO take your pick.

 

Was he making a point, Dave?

I thought he was just espousing hackneyed phraseology?

 

At this point what can we do?..... protesting does fa ck all......apathy does the same.....he aint selling....were screwed.....at least fordy will have a gleefull holiday season.....to be fair the boys should be applauded foday.....thats a minor miracle of a result.

 

They won't want their p45 for speaking negatively of Edin.

 

Plenty of Chairman have interfered in the past and will do so in the future. Occasionally, but admittedly rarely, it does some good. One thing is for certain is that none of the traditional old school managers you mentioned like it. So it's a bit like asking a turkey if it likes Xmas - hence a non story

A really 'sit up and take notice' angle on this would be if the likes of Vincent Tan and McAnthony, thought Rahic was out of order, i.e. those who have often found it hard not to be the centre of the club and have occasionally 'interfered'

Richmond did it with us - we only moaned when it went pear shaped after the Jewell fall out

Incidentally, it's just as much 'interfering' when Chairmen moan in public about how poor the team has been etc as it is when they suggest a players should be chosen or one can be just as bad as the other depending on the context

None of what I've written means to say that I'm ignorant of the failings of Edin including any interference - I'm just amazed it's seen as such an outrage

 

Exactly. Everyone can now clearly see what the players and managers have to deal with in Edin, it's so unacceptable it defies belief.

For the good of the club, Edin will soon be gone and we can get back to normal with football men leading the football club - as it should have been all along.

 

No not on the payroll Bronco. What about you ?

 

I very much doubt Edin would have me working for him, he likes his own way and doesnt like his employees questioning him.

 

Is that right How do you know that then ?

 

Look at the exodus of leaders and non-yes men types.

Prior to Hopkin arriving, we had zero leaders.

You can't deny it.

 

Er hang on a mo. Reading all that tells me you don’t exactly know what’s going on as I to listened to the Tom and Dom Interview and I cant remember the ‘ Its my way or highway ‘ quote ? Also you mention the Wetherby Whaler as regards employees giving advice ???? Is he an employee then ????? Oh and James Masons position became untenable did it ??? How do you know that then ????

Just asking and will be interested in your answers

 

Nope all needs to be answered please as imo
People make a lot of assumptions which are not totally correct.

 

That’s the easy way out !!!!

 

Nice perspective. I agree with your last line. I do think the appointment of Collins and a lack of attention to a fitness coach was far more of a reason for our decline, which of course he's responsible for

As we're seeing a soon a manager stands up to him, he interfere's less (similar occurred when Grayson was around and we hardly heard from him). Let's be honest the main interference occurred during McCall's time, where neither trusted each other and hence that's going to wrongly get a Chairman 'putting his nose in' more than he should

My point is, it's more a less a thing of the past. A very painful lesson though