Flyover Postponement

No I didn't but I have no reason, nor question @JonButterfield .

 

I don’t think @JonButterfield would do that, so I don’t think ppl should be suspicious of his role in the cancellation, however I am suspicious about what he has been told. My view on this is if the club had serious concerns about the flyover, they could have contacted Jon directly and explain how this might jeopardise the club.

 

This has got to be the biggest load of shii have ever read in my life. Arguing about a pathetic flyover that never happened.

 

I guess the answer is easy. Read something else.

 

I've read all of it and you can give your opinion and I'll give mine. What a waste of time. Bloody flyover. Who cares. Not me or anybody else.

 

Yawn.......

 

That's fine sir. Have a great evening.

 

I remember my first beer..

 

Disagreement is drunkeness. Not reallity.

 

It may not have gone ahead but it has made a difference my money can go to the burns unit or Stephen darbys charity.

 

Thank you for your contributions, I think I know where to file them.

 

That's how I read it, what kind of investor would turn snowflake at the prospect of the fly-past?

 

I say that a flyover is pointless. You can file it where you like.

 

You didn't contribute I take it.
Therefore you have no opinion regarding any decisions made.
Go be a WUM elsewhere.

 

And you too.

 

@mc bones I guess. I fear the last sentence, mind.

 

I know exactly what you mean.

 

The questions he’s asking are very valid though.

 

Time for bed. When you can't debate.

 

As a donator I accept that certain facts have come to light, positive I hope.
I was happy to state on here that in light of meets certain individuals have held i.e. John Dewhurst that perhaps the fly over be cancelled or at least remove Rupp's name.
The questions this individual is asking is mischief making and WUMMING.